<%@LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT" CODEPAGE="1252"%> Untitled Document
 
 
Money Laundering: The scale of the problem
Untitled Document
A wave of money laundering is sending shock waves through banks, building societies, lawyers and police. Fear of terrorist money, growing evidence of black Russian money washing through London, mushrooming credit card fraud have come together to terrify our law enforcement agencies, intelligence services, and, finally, at the end of the line, our banks.

This surge of black money undermines our belief in the financial system and allows many evil traders in drugs, weapons and stolen goods to profit by the City's good name and go free. No less than £2 trillion of black money is believed to circulate through London banks at any one time. London's name is now too often linked with that of Switzerland as an easy touch for money launderers. Who has forgotten the way banks in both countries accepted the ill-gotten millions of former Nigerian leader, President Abacha without blinking? How could this country have hosted for so long the corrupt banking empire of the collapsed Bank of Credit and Commerce International?

Yet, in spite of the damage these failure wreak on our reputation, there is a widespread belief that government lacks commitment to the fight against financial crime. Government appears oblivious to the need to spend heavily on training policemen in fighting complex financial crime. No more than 500 trained financial investigators investigate crime which runs into billions of pounds. This undermanned service achieves pitiful results. In the last year, there were just 129 prosecutions and 50 convictions for money laundering.

The Government's own National Policing Guidelines -- the standard set by the government for police priorities - give the game away. Serving policemen trying hard to put a cap on the burgeoning tide of black money are demoralized by the fact that financial fraud barely receives a mention in this key document.

Rosalind Wright, the former director of the Serious Fraud Office and a stalwart of the enforcement system, said recently that Chief constables were reluctant to put money and men into fraud investigation when government was encouraging them to investigate muggings and burglaries. No-one can doubt that these are the crimes that we fear most, but if this country's banking system is to regain its global financial credibility, the more esoteric money laundering and fraud offenses must be seen to be tackled.

The government's failure goes deeper further than its neglect of the police. The system it provides for transferring cases to the police for investigation is falling apart at the seams. A report published on Tuesday called for a complete overhaul of the system which government relies on to spot terrorist money, as well as fraudulent black money.

The system of tracking terrorist funds is supposed to snap into action when a bank notices a suspicious name or movement of cash. The bank follows the money to confirm its suspicion before notifying the government agency, called the National Criminal Intelligence Service. NCIS Despatches the Special Activity Report to the relevant police department. In the case of a terrorist suspicion, the SAR is sent to the Special Branch. This liaises with the intelligence service.

The problem here is that NCIS is completely overwhelmed by SARs. The number has jumped in the last three years from 18, 000 in 2000 to 63,000 last year (2004) and, although NCIS staff has increased, its performance has stalled. NCIS is now like a mailbox stuffed full of letters that no-one reads let alone answers. All those engaged in acquisitive crime, and that is no less than 70% of all criminals, must be laughing all the way to the bank.

The banks too are up in arms. They have invested heavily in technology to track the suspicious transactions, they have hired staff to spot the fraudster and the terrorist financier, and they have trained their cashiers to be suspicious, only to find that their reports are languishing in a policeman's mailbox. Carol Sergeant, a senior figure at the Financial Services Authority, which regulates the banks, expressed all bankers' frustration recently when she said that NCIS was 'swamped' and the reports her banking colleagues produced disappeared into a black hole. Draconian treatment of bankers who fail to report suspicious transactions - including prison -- makes the government's failure to produce a competent reporting system all the more bitterly ironic.

Government and police are not alone responsible for this national failure. Banks too have let the side down. When George Bush declared a war on money laundering in the wake of the September 11 outrage, they went into overdrive in reporting the least suspicion. They were so concerned about missing a terrorist account on their books and later being found to have handled dirty money that that they went well beyond examining the black listed names and organizations produced by the US government. Police say they reported Islamic organizations and people without sufficient investigation. In the end , the British authorities were not only unable to investigate every report, but lost faith in the process.

This is to the detriment of the country's safety, as well as to its financial well-being. Terrorist and dirty money needs to be intercepted and seized, and banks are the first policemen to spot it and alert law enforcement authorities. This is a system that badly needs to be joined up. While banks must be supported by a government that understands their role in the system, police efforts need to be invigorated with more training, closer links with the financial community and more defined targets. Until this is achieved, those peddling the fruits of financial crime will push at every weak point in the system, and become rich at our expense. Worse still, terrorists will have a route for moving money around the world that leaves none of us secure.